[Github-comments] [geany/geany-plugins] Update pt_BR.po (PR #1260)

2023-07-03 Thread @liomarhora via Github-comments
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1260 -- Commit Summary -- * Update pt_BR.po -- File Changes -- M po/pt_BR.po (8) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1260.patch

[Github-comments] Re: [geany/geany-osx] Hierarchical view for document list (Issue #46)

2023-07-03 Thread cloudis-ild via Github-comments
Excellent, thanks. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-osx/issues/46#issuecomment-1617704246 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

[Github-comments] Re: [geany/geany-osx] Hierarchical view for document list (Issue #46)

2023-07-03 Thread cloudis-ild via Github-comments
Closed #46 as completed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-osx/issues/46#event-9706449180 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

[Github-comments] Re: [geany/geany-osx] Hierarchical view for document list (Issue #46)

2023-07-03 Thread elextr via Github-comments
The current Geany Git has a "show tree" in the documents pane right click menu. So it will be in the next release. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-osx/issues/46#issuecomment-1617695691 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to

[Github-comments] [geany/geany-osx] Hierarchical view for document list (Issue #46)

2023-07-03 Thread cloudis-ild via Github-comments
MacBook Pro, Ventura 13.4.1 Whilst working through the resolution of a previous issue (https://github.com/geany/geany-osx/issues/42) one pre-release version of Geany was able to show the document list as a hierarchical tree rather than a flat list. The subsequent release build (Sulamar 1.38

[Github-comments] Re: [geany/geany-plugins] Compiling geangy-plugins appeared errors (Issue #1255)

2023-07-03 Thread elextr via Github-comments
It is endemic in C++ code for STL headers to be forgotten but everything worked because some other header included the one needed. As described in the link you provided, GCC has simply removed some of those situations, now they fail without explicit inclusion. IIRC there is an alpha standard