> Actually, I happened to confused myself a few times in the past by not
> exactly remembering if the current version is 1.37, .38 or .39.
IIRC that was Linus's excuse for bumping the Linux major version, out of
fingers and toes :-)
> In a few years we might have 3.141592 or so :).
Isn't that
Merged #3569 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3569#event-10568542023
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
> stable", I'm kind of neutral here. But in the spirit of linux kernel
> numbering "when the number behind the dot gets too big, let's bump the major
> version", it's a good move.)
I didn't know this is the Linux kernel numbering scheme but it's pragmatic :).
Actually, I happened to confused
I don't care actually, I'd have went with 1.23456789 until the end of times,
but I'm not saying it's a good idea :smile:
If you like 2.0, let's do it.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3569#issuecomment-1749543274
You are receiving this
No objections at all.
(While I was a vocal proponent of the 1.xx release to "make Geany stable", I'm
kind of neutral here. But in the spirit of linux kernel numbering "when the
number behind the dot gets too big, let's bump the major version", it's a good
move.)
--
Reply to this email
I'm on the 2.0 band wagon since a long time :-)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3569#issuecomment-1746221351
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@kugel- approved this pull request.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3569#pullrequestreview-1656752990
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
