This is not really the right fix, `g_return_*if_fail()` is supposed to catch
programming error, to check the contract between the caller and the callee.
Admittedly here the values are accessed before the contract is checked, which
is probably worth fixing, but the bug itself is that these
Just from the top of my head, wouldn't it be better to evaluate `structa` when
over `structa`, and `structa->item1` when over `item1`? I think it's
reasonably useful to be able to get the evaluation of a part of the expression,
here the parent.
Also if you wanted to be thorough, the C and C++
I will try to find the trouble source. Anyway I would like to keep the existing
changes for better stability in case of an error.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> Just from the top of my head, wouldn't it be better to evaluate `structa`
> when over `structa`, and `structa->item1` when over `item1`?
Yes, good idea. I'll try to implement that.
> Also if you wanted to be thorough, the C and C++ syntax allows for any kind
> of spaces between `structa`,
Done. The wrong call came from ```stack_entry()``` because of not checking the
result of ```gtk_tree_selection_get_selected()```.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #1767.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1767#event-2153510009
@van-de-bugger pushed 1 commit.
0ded9a34031b46acf5148ee97ec53f170d889e91 Field width in statusbar template
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
Version is Geany 1.34. Accepting to wrap search results in the string NOT
being found although there are many instances in the document. No, I didn't
check _Search backwards_. Somehow _Match only a whole word_ **was** checked;
unchecking it led to a correct result. The report is in error.