I think it's better to not use `.exe`, generally only C/C++ and similar
languages produce `.exe` files and as @b4n mentioned, it's not required even if
the output has an `.exe` extension.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view
Came up on IRC, for windows the execute command should have a .exe extension.
Note due to my lack of windows access the win branch of the `#ifdef` has not
even been compiled, a winspurt should test and/or comment.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
Closed #1305.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1305#event-860867927
Ok, if more than one extension is executable without specifying the extension,
then since this is a language independent default, it should not have the
extension.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Windows doesn't require the `.exe` suffix to successfully run the program.
Maybe it's interesting in case there is more than one possibility (like same
basename with both `bat` and `.exe` extensions?), I have no idea what happens
there.
But well, if there's a reason to do so, why not.
--
You
