Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Enhance detection of sh functions (#662)

2018-04-14 Thread konsolebox
@b4n I interpret that ctags developers prefer everyone to be happy. See https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags/issues/1261#issuecomment-270820933. Conflicts among syntaxes would have to be ignored for that sake. I'll just choose not to oppose. -- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Enhance detection of sh functions (#662)

2018-03-22 Thread Colomban Wendling
@konsolebox Actually Universal-CTags changed to have the extended syntax as default: universal-ctags/ctags@ec5981f75be07ed827000d06a3d8cc7b8c70ea8d It could be interesting to get your opinion there given the thought you put into it, and possible specific tests etc. If it's not a good idea

Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Enhance detection of sh functions (#662)

2018-03-22 Thread konsolebox
Sorry guys I made a mistake here. I was wrong about the idea that only the `function` keyword allows other characters besides `[[:alnum:]_]`. The classic syntax allows it as well. The only significant difference is that the classic syntax conflicts with `extglob`, whereas the `function` keyword

Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Enhance detection of sh functions (#662)

2018-03-21 Thread Colomban Wendling
@LarsGit223 Not yet, apparently we didn't import the change back in Geany yet -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/662#issuecomment-375093482

Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Enhance detection of sh functions (#662)

2018-03-21 Thread LarsGit223
@b4n: I saw your change to universal-ctags has been merged a long time ago. Can this be closed then? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/662#issuecomment-375079657