Merged #1574.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1574#event-1196534472
b4n approved this pull request.
Looks reasonable and I can't see any bashisms in there indeed (makes me wonder
why I made it a Bash script in the first place, I guess the script probably
grew out of it). And anyway if Travis, you guys and me test it OK, it should
be safe.
--
You are
Works for me in Ubuntu, and script runs with GNU bash with `--posix` too.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1574#issuecomment-320453362
no bashisms.
me@gentoo ~ $ checkbashisms runner.sh
me@gentoo ~ $
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1574#issuecomment-320452537
@kloun would you be able to run the script through
[checkbashisms](http://openports.se/sysutils/checkbashisms) to verify that it
doesn't contain any Bash-specific features?
I think on some Linuxes `/bin/sh` refers to Bash/Dash in some kind of POSIX
compatibility mode, needs testing there too.
