[GitHub] [arrow] wesm commented on pull request #6725: ARROW-8226: [Go] Implement 64 bit offsets binary builder
wesm commented on pull request #6725: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6725#issuecomment-650356376 Well, that is definitely a bummer. I hope to see some growth in the Go developer community here in the future. I'll close this PR for now then This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [arrow] wesm commented on pull request #6725: ARROW-8226: [Go] Implement 64 bit offsets binary builder
wesm commented on pull request #6725: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6725#issuecomment-649076794 @sbinet could you assist with this? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [arrow] wesm commented on pull request #6725: ARROW-8226: [Go] Implement 64 bit offsets binary builder
wesm commented on pull request #6725: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6725#issuecomment-649076694 Hm, at a high level it seems like it might be better to have a separate set of LargeBinary types rather than try to pack both 32-bit and 64-bit into the same types. This means some code duplication (given Go's current generics/templates situation) but perhaps for the best This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
