Re: [gitorious] Upgrade from v2.3.2 to v.2.4.7

2013-02-11 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Kerr wrote: > I do have to wonder if it might be better to just roll up an RPM and be done > with it. Gitorious is already structured in a way that would lend its self > well to this, I believe. Or skip the dependencies and just have the a bunch > of good

Re: [gitorious] Upgrade from v2.3.2 to v.2.4.7

2013-02-11 Thread Andrew Kerr
Thanks, good to know. I decided that, in the long run, a manual installation was a better way for me to go. The installer does too many "evil" things on a system that is part of a managed network. For example, removing ruby/puppet from the machine to use its own - that really screwed things u

Re: [gitorious] Upgrade from v2.3.2 to v.2.4.7

2013-02-11 Thread Christian Johansen
FWIW, I also added some of the "untracked files" to our updated .gitignore file. Christian Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson writes: > Andrew, > > - We're releasing an upgraded version of the installer this week, > including the latest Gitorious version and improvements in how/what it > installs. We'll an

Re: [gitorious] git push doesn't display on gitorious activities

2013-02-11 Thread Marius MÃ¥rnes Mathiesen
Chiku Linu writes: > Hi, > > Fresh gitorious install with rvm ree default and gemset for gitorious. > gitorious folder got .rvmrc and when I'm inside this folder env is set for > this gemset. > > then 1st try : > git clone works. > when git push, commits are pushed on repository and I can browser

Re: [gitorious] Upgrade from v2.3.2 to v.2.4.7

2013-02-11 Thread Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
Andrew, - We're releasing an upgraded version of the installer this week, including the latest Gitorious version and improvements in how/what it installs. We'll announce it on the gitorious blog once it's up and available. - Regarding rake tasks etc, this has been more fiddly than necessary