On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Kerr wrote:
> I do have to wonder if it might be better to just roll up an RPM and be done
> with it. Gitorious is already structured in a way that would lend its self
> well to this, I believe. Or skip the dependencies and just have the a bunch
> of good
Thanks, good to know. I decided that, in the long run, a manual
installation was a better way for me to go. The installer does too many
"evil" things on a system that is part of a managed network. For example,
removing ruby/puppet from the machine to use its own - that really screwed
things u
FWIW, I also added some of the "untracked files" to our updated
.gitignore file.
Christian
Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson writes:
> Andrew,
>
> - We're releasing an upgraded version of the installer this week,
> including the latest Gitorious version and improvements in how/what it
> installs. We'll an
Andrew,
- We're releasing an upgraded version of the installer this week,
including the latest Gitorious version and improvements in how/what it
installs. We'll announce it on the gitorious blog once it's up and
available.
- Regarding rake tasks etc, this has been more fiddly than necessary
I just install gitorious on a clean CentOS 6 machine using the installation
script located here: http://getgitorious.com/installer. I assume this is
the supported method?
Surprisingly, this installed a pretty old version - v2.3.2, and not the
most recent.
I've spent many hours trying to upgra
