Re: [gitorious] V3.0 status

2013-03-18 Thread Johannes Ernst
I did it again from scratch, and this time it worked. The ways of dependency management are mysterious. Well well. On Mar 17, 2013, at 5:05, Christian Johansen chrisj...@gmail.com wrote: makes sense! So based on what you said, I've been plunging into trying to get 'next' to run today, and as

Re: [gitorious] V3.0 status

2013-03-17 Thread Christian Johansen
makes sense! So based on what you said, I've been plunging into trying to get 'next' to run today, and as I (hopefully) make progress, I'll be reporting / asking about any problems I encounter. With the caveat that I'm not a ruby guy, so some things may be very obvious to everybody other than

[gitorious] V3.0 status

2013-03-15 Thread jernst
How stable is V3.0 / next? Any idea when it will be stable enough to run real projects with? The best info I found was this post http://blog.gitorious.org/2013/01/04/gitorious-3-0-lands-in-the-next-branch/ which talks about a week or two but that doesn't seem to be right unless I'm missing

Re: [gitorious] V3.0 status

2013-03-15 Thread Marius MÃ¥rnes Mathiesen
jer...@cldstr.com writes: How stable is V3.0 / next? Any idea when it will be stable enough to run real projects with? Johannes, It's been a while :-) I don't remember if we've communicated this earlier, but we made some changes to our original plan. Our original plan was to first launch 3.0,

Re: [gitorious] V3.0 status

2013-03-15 Thread Johannes Ernst
Hi Marius, makes sense! So based on what you said, I've been plunging into trying to get 'next' to run today, and as I (hopefully) make progress, I'll be reporting / asking about any problems I encounter. With the caveat that I'm not a ruby guy, so some things may be very obvious to everybody