Mridula, thank you for this update on the INFODEV-supported SITA and
MitraMandal, around which you raise crucial questions of job placement
for project trainees. As I'm sure you know, the relationship between
training and presumed 'jobs' that hypothetically await successful
trainees has always been one of the most vexed and difficult problems
facing program designers/evaluators, and is by no means limited to
India, or even to these kinds of approaches or communities. I think the
issue is broadly at the base of all 'human resources development'
strategies ( the subject of the forthcoming ECOSOC 2002 High Level
Segment), and symbolic of major shortcomings in HRD policy and practice.
Assumptions under which public training programs are usually themselves
'marketed' include statements about increased job-skills, without
specifying how those job-skills are identified, or defined, or even if
they are empirical (i.e. derived directly from the contextual
'job-market' which trainees will face). Yet outcome measures usually
include measures of 'placement', again usually short-term without regard
to how long or how successfully the job-entrant does over time. Western
literature (including western 'expert' studies of worldwide HRD
vocational education and training programs) is replete with evidence
that those who successfully complete training programs either have
difficulty finding jobs, or find them in very different areas from those
in which they were trained. So I suggest this is not just a problem for
SITA trainees, but raises much broader questions. Many countries today
are full of high school, even university graduates who are unable to
find jobs commensurate with their expectations or perceived skills
levels.
The work that SITA has done is groundbreaking and has surely brought
hope and gratification to its 400+ women who have completed the
training. Just bringing the IT world closer to life of poorer Indian
communities may be seen as a benefit in itself, though scant reward for
those who want the training to lead to tangible improvements personally
in their own livelihoods.
The SITA webpage states that each trainee was given a Certificate and
assistance in getting employment. I am curious to ask what kind of
assistance that was, and to what extent it was based on actual
(empirically supported) knowledge of employment opportunities in
communities where the trainees lived, their own aspirations/expectations
regarding 'job' pursuit, and the expectations of those who would employ
the succesful trainees.
Is there any possibility that the training for these women could lead to
(parttime?) employment in some way as outreach workers (analagous to
community health assistants) serving as official links between
government (state and local) and local communities as frontline liaison
persons? Or could they become themselves basic trainers in their own
communities regarding introduction of IT into these communities? Im not
sure of precedents for this, but perhaps others on this network can
identify some?
***GKD is an initiative of the Global Knowledge Partnership***
To post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. In the 1st line of the message type:
subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd
Archives of previous GKD messages can be found at:
http://www.globalknowledge.org