Bugs item #642810, was opened at 2002-11-23 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=642810group_id=8032
Category: Driver
Group: 5.04.1
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe English (jenglish)
Assigned to: Simon Marlow
Bugs item #651842, was opened at 2002-12-11 05:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=651842group_id=8032
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: whee (whee)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #655400, was opened at 2002-12-17 20:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=655400group_id=8032
Category: Compiler
Group: 5.04.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Henrik Nilsson (nhn)
Assigned to:
I just went through an interesting (== painful) remote debugging
session with one of my clients which could be avoided by improving
an error message.
If you compile a program for profiling but don't have profiling
versions of the standard libraries, then the linker generates reports
| That would be the analysis if the export list were (module M), but
| If the export list is omitted, all values, types and classes defined
| in the module are exported, _but not those that are imported_.
| There should never be ambiguity or conflicts if the export list is
| omitted.
Stupid me.
