Re: [GHC] #1709: simplifier causes stack overflow in ghc-6.8.0.20070916

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1709: simplifier causes stack overflow in ghc-6.8.0.20070916 -+-- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1625: Windows installer: no Users guide or Cabal docs

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1625: Windows installer: no Users guide or Cabal docs -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: igloo Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8.1

[GHC] #1778: Linux binary distributions only have one RTS way

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1778: Linux binary distributions only have one RTS way ---+ Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.8.1

Re: bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:35:08PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: Serge I've just compiled docon-2.10 with the current 6.8 branch. It compiles fine. Log is below [..] Thank you. I looked into the log that you have enclosed. 1. Instance import. You see that GHC warns about a couple

Re: [GHC] #1540: GHC on Macs

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1540: GHC on Macs -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: thorkilnaur Type: task | Status: new Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8 branch Component: Build System

[GHC] #1779: unknown symbol `hs_hpc_module'

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1779: unknown symbol `hs_hpc_module' --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHCi |

Re: [GHC] #1540: GHC on Macs

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1540: GHC on Macs -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: thorkilnaur Type: task | Status: new Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8 branch Component: Build System

Re: [GHC] #1193: panic! addImpDecls in TH_dataD1 test

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1193: panic! addImpDecls in TH_dataD1 test -+-- Reporter: igloo |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal|Milestone: 6.6.2

Re: bug 1711 revisited

2007-10-17 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Hal, On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:54:32PM -0700, Hal Perkins wrote: Sorry to revive a dead horse, but there's still a bit of a problem with building ghc on os x because of missing files that need to be created by happy. I downloaded the current stable sources yesterday

Re: empty export warning

2007-10-17 Thread Isaac Dupree
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote: People, here is a more precise report about empty _export_ in ghc-6.8.1-candidate: I use module M1 (f, module M2) where import M2 () f = ... in the situation when M1 imports some

-O in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
Dear GHC developers, Has -O any meaning in ghc-6.8.1-candidate ? I build docon under ghc-6.8.1-candidate under -O and with skipping it (the line of -O commented out in docon.cabal). And it installs the .a library of the same size, and the test running takes the same time.

Re: -O in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Don Stewart
mechvel: Dear GHC developers, Has -O any meaning in ghc-6.8.1-candidate ? I build docon under ghc-6.8.1-candidate under -O and with skipping it (the line of -O commented out in docon.cabal). And it installs the .a library of the same size, and the test running takes the

Re: -O in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
To my question about -O in ghc-6.8.1-candidate Don Stewart wrote on Wed, Oct 17 By default cabal uses ghc -O to build projects, so you won't see any difference if you comment it out of the cabal file. You will however if you explicitly turn off optimisations: I see now, thank you. I'd

Re: [GHC] #1779: unknown symbol `hs_hpc_module'

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1779: unknown symbol `hs_hpc_module' +--- Reporter: guest|Owner: AndyGill Type: feature request | Status: assigned Priority: low |Milestone:

[GHC] #1780: runInteractiveProcess broken with 2 processes on POSIX

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1780: runInteractiveProcess broken with 2 processes on POSIX ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component:

Re: -O in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:51 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: mechvel: Dear GHC developers, Has -O any meaning in ghc-6.8.1-candidate ? I build docon under ghc-6.8.1-candidate under -O and with skipping it (the line of -O commented out in docon.cabal). And it installs the

Re: ghc for docon-2.10

2007-10-17 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:10:12PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote: Dear GHC developers, please try any appropriate ghc-6.8* candidate for making the public docon-2.10 and running its test module. Looks good to me with 6.8.0.20071016. Thanks Ian

RE: -O in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| By default cabal uses ghc -O to build projects, so you won't see any | difference if you comment it out of the cabal file. You will however | if you explicitly turn off optimisations: | | ghc-options: -Onot This is perhaps a bit confusing. Is it documented in the cabal manual? It's not

Re: [GHC] #1241: Functional dependency Coverage Condition is lifted, and should not be

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1241: Functional dependency Coverage Condition is lifted, and should not be +--- Reporter: guest|Owner: Type: bug | Status: new

[GHC] #1781: Type equality class leads to non-termination

2007-10-17 Thread GHC
#1781: Type equality class leads to non-termination --+- Reporter: chak | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal |