Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-07-15 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away --+- Reporter: dons | Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-07-06 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: merge Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-06-28 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-06-09 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-04 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-04 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-04 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-04 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-04 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-04 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-03 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-03 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-03 Thread Don Stewart
That's a very common idiom. Interestingly, we have: -- | Strict (call-by-value) application, defined in terms of 'seq'. ($!):: (a - b) - a - b #ifdef __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ f $! x = let !vx = x in f vx -- see #2273 #elif !defined(__HUGS__) f $! x = x `seq` f x On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:13

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-05-02 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-04-30 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-04-30 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-04-19 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

[GHC] #5129: evaluate optimized away

2011-04-17 Thread GHC
#5129: evaluate optimized away -+-- Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|