[GHC] #5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies

2011-03-10 Thread GHC
#5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies -+-- Reporter: jcpetruzza| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new

Re: [GHC] #5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies

2011-03-10 Thread GHC
#5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies ---+ Reporter: jcpetruzza | Owner: Type: bug| Status

Re: [GHC] #5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies

2011-03-10 Thread GHC
#5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies +--- Reporter: jcpetruzza | Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed

Re: [GHC] #5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies

2011-03-10 Thread GHC
#5012: haskell 98 program does not typecheck when compiled with -XTypeFamilies +--- Reporter: jcpetruzza | Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed

Re: [GHC] #4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code

2010-10-18 Thread GHC
#4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code -+-- Reporter: sjoerd_visscher | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code

2010-10-18 Thread GHC
#4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code -+-- Reporter: sjoerd_visscher | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code

2010-10-18 Thread GHC
#4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code -+-- Reporter: sjoerd_visscher | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

[GHC] #4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code

2010-10-14 Thread GHC
#4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code -+-- Reporter: sjoerd_visscher | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code

2010-10-14 Thread GHC
#4399: Infinite loop when compiling Haskell '98 code +--- Reporter: sjoerd_visscher | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report.

2010-01-13 Thread GHC
#3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report. --+- Reporter: lilac |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new

[GHC] #3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report.

2009-12-16 Thread GHC
#3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report. -+-- Reporter: lilac | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new

Re: [GHC] #3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report.

2009-12-16 Thread GHC
#3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report. --+- Reporter: lilac | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new

Re: [GHC] #3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report.

2009-12-16 Thread GHC
#3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report. --+- Reporter: lilac | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new

Re: [GHC] #3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report.

2009-12-16 Thread GHC
#3766: Parsing of lambdas is not consistent with Haskell'98 report. --+- Reporter: lilac | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new

Re: [GHC] #3014: Any type being derived in Haskell 98 module

2009-02-19 Thread GHC
#3014: Any type being derived in Haskell 98 module +--- Reporter: fasta|Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2009-02-11 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: high

[GHC] #3014: Any type being derived in Haskell 98 module

2009-02-10 Thread GHC
#3014: Any type being derived in Haskell 98 module -+-- Reporter: fasta | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #3014: Any type being derived in Haskell 98 module

2009-02-10 Thread GHC
#3014: Any type being derived in Haskell 98 module -+-- Reporter: fasta| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2009-01-08 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2009-01-07 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2009-01-05 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2009-01-05 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2009-01-02 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

[GHC] #2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty

2008-11-05 Thread GHC
#2746: Documentation for Haskell 98 modules is empty -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #2735: ghc panic with Haskell 98 program (applyTypeToArgs?)

2008-11-03 Thread GHC
#2735: ghc panic with Haskell 98 program (applyTypeToArgs?) --+- Reporter: int-e | Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #2735: ghc panic with Haskell 98 program (applyTypeToArgs?)

2008-11-03 Thread GHC
#2735: ghc panic with Haskell 98 program (applyTypeToArgs?) --+- Reporter: int-e | Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

[GHC] #2735: ghc panic with Haskell 98 program (applyTypeToArgs?)

2008-11-02 Thread GHC
#2735: ghc panic with Haskell 98 program (applyTypeToArgs?) -+-- Reporter: int-e | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program

2007-02-27 Thread GHC
#1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program --+- Reporter: neil | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.6.1

Re: [GHC] #1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program

2007-02-27 Thread GHC
#1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program --+- Reporter: neil | Owner: Type: bug | Status: reopened Priority: low | Milestone

Re: [GHC] #1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program

2007-02-26 Thread GHC
#1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program --+- Reporter: neil | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.6.1

[GHC] #1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program

2007-02-24 Thread GHC
#1171: GHC generates incorrect code with -O for Haskell 98 program -+-- Reporter: neil | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone

Haskell 98

2002-09-25 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| The report says The expression F {}, where F is a data constructor, is | legal whether or not F was declared with record syntax, provided F has no | strict fields: it denotes F _|_1 ... _|_n where n is the arity of F. | | It unclear to me why there needs to be this provision for records with

Re: Haskell 98

2002-09-25 Thread Ross Paterson
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:34:53PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: I spoke too soon. Consider data F = F Int !Int data S = S { x::Int, y::!Int } According to the words above F {} is illegal but what about this one? S {} I think the sentence in question (end of 3.15.2)

RE: Haskell 98

2002-09-25 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| I think the sentence in question (end of 3.15.2) is just a clarification; | the preceding 4 rules are sufficient and clear: F{}, S{} and S{x=3} are | all illegal because they omit a value for a strict field. That is, it's | correct, though not strictly necessary, nor does it cover all the

RE: Haskell 98

2002-09-25 Thread Hal Daume III
Blargh. Excellent point. I had totally forgotten that. I withdraw all suggested changes except a cross-ref to the section you mention. Sigh. My brain is getting soft. Actually the rules referenced appear immediately above, so no reference is necessary. My original message was not

RE: Green Card and Haskell 98 yet again

1999-04-22 Thread Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
on upgrading Green Card to work for Haskell 98? Of course it would be easy to hack it myself, but I'd very much rather be able to use an official version. I would like to be able to use Green Card with both GHC 4.02 and Hugs 98.