Stefan Holdermans:
Peter,
I've run into a bug that looks to be the same as the one described
here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1897
It does not seem like a bug, although the type-error message may be
a bit confusing as is the fact that GHC happily infers a type for
the
Hello,
I've run into a bug that looks to be the same as the one described here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1897
That bug was reported 7 months ago, and I didn't want to modify the bug
just to add a me too entry to it. Is this a major bug that I
shouldn't expect to be fixed
Peter,
I've run into a bug that looks to be the same as the one described
here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1897
It does not seem like a bug, although the type-error message may be a
bit confusing as is the fact that GHC happily infers a type for the
signature-less
Stefan Holdermans wrote:
Peter,
I've run into a bug that looks to be the same as the one described here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1897
It does not seem like a bug, although the type-error message may be a
bit confusing as is the fact that GHC happily infers a type for the
