Re: runghc printing result of main when main is not IO ()

Tomasz Zielonka wrote: Hello! Consider: $ cat R.hs main = return [()] $ runghc R.hs [()] This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc mimics the way a compiled program behaves. This doesn't happen with 6.6.1, I believe we fixed it at some point by having runghc

Re: runghc printing result of main when main is not IO ()

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: Tomasz Zielonka wrote: Hello! Consider: $ cat R.hs main = return [()] $ runghc R.hs [()] This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc mimics the way a compiled program behaves. This doesn't happen with 6.6.1,

Re: runghc printing result of main when main is not IO ()

tomasz.zielonka: On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: Tomasz Zielonka wrote: Hello! Consider: $ cat R.hs main = return [()] $ runghc R.hs [()] This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc mimics the way a compiled program behaves. This

runghc printing result of main when main is not IO ()

Hello! Consider: $ cat R.hs main = return [()] $ runghc R.hs [()] This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc mimics the way a compiled program behaves. Best regards Tomek ___ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list