> (1)
> To make ghc-2.04 putting .o files into the given subdirectory,
> say, `o_hi', we command
> ghc -c Foo.hs -odir o_hi
>
> What is the similar option for .hi ?
> I cannot find it in the ghc user guide. It suggests only
>
> ghc -c Foo
Third in a series on the same set of files.
Thanks to Sigbjorn Finne's patch, the entire program now
compiles. However, the produced program now dies with a segmentation
fault. The text (which will probably help not one whit) occurs as
follows:
Segmentation fault caught, address = 38209318
IOT
Byron Cook writes:
> ghc2.05 isnt deleting the tmp files it creates during compilation.
>
It definitely should do. I do need more info to go on here - what
files, how to reproduce etc.
There are some cases where the driver leaves some droppings behind (if
you hit ^C at inopportune moments), b
> Then I increased the number of threads to 1M, and got:
>
> ewk@hydra% bench1
> Heap exhausted;
> while trying to allocate 32 bytes in a 4194312-byte heap;
> use `+RTS -H' to increase the total heap size.
>
> I now obediently ran the program with 16MB heap:
>
> e
Josh
> Some questions about arrays:
> It sounds like, according to this specification, there has to be a thunk
> for every element of the array. This brings up the usual trade-off: this is
> elegant and flexible, but slow.
> ??? - For generic GHC Array's, is a thunk created for each individ
ghc2.05 isnt deleting the tmp files it creates during compilation.
i assume that there is some flag that i need to set the ghc Perl script
byron
i dont know. i cant reproduce it either.
it must have just been me or something maybe i ran out of disk space
byron
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
>
> Byron Cook writes:
> >
> > I successfully built 2.05
> >
>
> Great, hope it turns out to be useful.
>
> >
> > one pr
