Re: reader/ReadPrefix.lhs:159: Non-exhaustive patterns in case

1998-06-08 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Marc van Dongen writes: > Hi there, > > While trying to compile the following eroneous program > > > module Buggy( buggy ) where > > buggy = _ > > with ghc-3.02, ghc decided to go down with the following > error message: > reader/ReadPrefix.lhs:159: Non-exhaustive patterns in case > Thanks

false alarm

1998-06-08 Thread S.D.Mechveliani
I wrote recently > By the way, DoCon-1.07 (http://haskell.org/docon/) > compiles with ghc-3.01, but *very probably* it would not do it with > ghc-3.02 - even after the above bug is fixed. Sorry, this is, probably, false alarm. I recall: it contains several `SPECIALIZE' pragmas that migh

type bug in 3.02. Reply to reply

1998-06-08 Thread S.D.Mechveliani
Hello, bug readers, Simon L Peyton Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replies to my request > ... It's a definite and embarassing bug > ... > I guess we'll have to put out 3.03 shortly to fix this (and other trivia). > If you are stuck we'll hurry it up. > ... It appeares that so far, i am not stuck.

Re: bug (?) in ghc-3.02

1998-06-08 Thread Simon L Peyton Jones
Thank you for a fine bug report. It's a definite and embarassing bug, I'm afraid. Adding a type signature for minInRow would be a workaround, but it may be hard to find the right places in your big program. I guess we'll have to put out 3.03 shortly to fix this (and other trivia). If you are