RE: problems building the GHC as a package

2004-04-28 Thread Mauro La Salete Costa Lima de Araujo
> You don't need to build the RTS when building GHC as a package. If you > want to do this, you have to remove BuildPackageGHC=YES from build.mk, > build the compiler, RTS and libraries, and then add BuildPackageGHC=YES > again. But I don't think you need to do this; just build the compiler > in

problems building the GHC as a package

2004-04-28 Thread Mauro La Salete Costa Lima de Araujo
> You don't need to build the RTS when building GHC as a package. If you > want to do this, you have to remove BuildPackageGHC=YES from build.mk, > build the compiler, RTS and libraries, and then add BuildPackageGHC=YES > again. But I don't think you need to do this; just build the compiler > in

Missing TH exports

2004-04-28 Thread Duncan Coutts
In the past month or two a few convenience functions from Language.Haskell.TH.Lib seem to have been dropped from the export list for Language.Haskell.TH. This is in ghc cvs HEAD. Just wondering if this was an oversight or if there was a reason. The ones I noticed are: forallT, listT, infixC Dunc