Re: forkIO and not -threaded

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 01:29 +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote: > Hi, > > main = do > forkIO $ print "yes" > print "done" > > Compiled without -threaded, on 6.2.2 gives > > "yes" > "done" > > on 6.4.2 > > "done" > > Seems the semantics of forkIO in this case has changed completely? Actually what

forkIO and not -threaded

2006-07-28 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi, main = do forkIO $ print "yes" print "done" Compiled without -threaded, on 6.2.2 gives "yes" "done" on 6.4.2 "done" Seems the semantics of forkIO in this case has changed completely? Of course, I actually wanted -threaded and had forgot it, so I'm entirely happy if it just raises an e

Re: [GHC] #838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64

2006-07-28 Thread GHC
#838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64 --+- Reporter: alter| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64

2006-07-28 Thread GHC
#838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64 --+- Reporter: alter| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64

2006-07-28 Thread GHC
#838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64 --+- Reporter: alter| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64

2006-07-28 Thread GHC
#838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64 --+- Reporter: alter| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone:

[GHC] #838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64

2006-07-28 Thread GHC
#838: GHC binary for FreeBSD/amd64 +--- Reporter: alter|Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone: Component: C

Re: [GHC] #837: Infer fully qualified names to overcome namespace clashes

2006-07-28 Thread GHC
#837: Infer fully qualified names to overcome namespace clashes -+-- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: nobody Type: feature request | Status: closed Priority: normal |