[GHC] #1300: ghc does not build

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1300: ghc does not build ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |Version: 6.7

Re: [GHC] #1297: No LANGUAGE option for # in symbols

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1297: No LANGUAGE option for # in symbols -+-- Reporter: neil |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Component: Compiler |

[GHC] #1301: make install does more than that

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1301: make install does more than that ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |

[GHC] #1302: Unwanted output when installing

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1302: Unwanted output when installing ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |

[GHC] #1303: Library build fails on Windows

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1303: Library build fails on Windows ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |

[GHC] #1304: Make install fails

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1304: Make install fails ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |Version: 6.7

[GHC] #1305: Installed ghci doesn't work

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1305: Installed ghci doesn't work ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |

Re: [GHC] #1290: ghc runs preprocessor too much

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1290: ghc runs preprocessor too much +--- Reporter: guest|Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone: Component: Driver |

Re: [GHC] #1295: .bat files not removed

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1295: .bat files not removed -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal|Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version:

[GHC] #1306: GHC generates warning about internally generated functions

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1306: GHC generates warning about internally generated functions ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone:

[GHC] #1307: Warning refers to code not in the source

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1307: Warning refers to code not in the source ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler

Re: [GHC] #1296: -fwarn-monomorphism-restriction breaks package compilation

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1296: -fwarn-monomorphism-restriction breaks package compilation -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal|Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #1300: ghc does not build

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1300: ghc does not build -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal|Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 6.7

Re: [GHC] #29: Check for exhaustive patterns is broken

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#29: Check for exhaustive patterns is broken -+-- Reporter: nobody|Owner: nobody Type: bug | Status: assigned Priority: lowest|Milestone: _|_ Component: Compiler

[GHC] #1308: Type signature in warning is wrong

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1308: Type signature in warning is wrong ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: Component: Compiler |

Re: ghci value printing

2007-04-27 Thread Lemmih
On 4/27/07, Frederik Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, It seems the printing behaviour of ghci has changed recently? $ ghci --version The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.4.2 $ ghci ... return 5 --(a0) x - return 5 --(b0) Leaving GHCi. $ ghci --version The

[GHC] #1309: 6.6.1 source tarball contains non-executable rts/gmp/configure; breaks build

2007-04-27 Thread GHC
#1309: 6.6.1 source tarball contains non-executable rts/gmp/configure; breaks build ---+ Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority:

Re: ghci value printing

2007-04-27 Thread Tomasz Zielonka
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:22:26PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: I like the new printing behaviour for (a1), but not for (b1). How do I bind a variable to the result of an IO action without printing that variable? It seems that the value is not printed when there are more than one pattern