Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-12 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:52:18PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote:
> > > In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect
> > > paths, such as
> > >
> > > haddockInterfaces =
> > > ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers\\containers.haddock"],
> > > haddockHTMLs = ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers"]
> > >
> > > In fact, the installation location is c:/ghc/ghc-6.8.20070909/, not
> > > /usr/local.  I do have a failed partial ghc build (from darcs HEAD) at
> > > /usr/local from last week.  Perhaps there's some sticky info somewhere.
> > > [...]
> > 
> > There was some confusion regarding build paths vs. installation paths in 
> > GHC's 
> > build system. I think I've fixed most of this in the last few days, at 
> > least 
> > I get a nice RPM on Linux now. Could you try to update to the bleeding edge 
> > and rebuild? It would be good to have some Windows feedback.
> 
> I think Conal is using the Windows bindist, which ought to be
> relocatable but the doc paths weren't. I'm looking into this.

Should work in tomorrow's build.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs


Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-11 Thread Conal Elliott
That's right, I'm using the windows binary installer from 0909.

I haven't managed to build from HEAD sources lately, so I wasn't able to try
the latest, as Sven suggested.   - Conal

On 9/11/07, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote:
> > > In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and
> incorrect
> > > paths, such as
> > >
> > > haddockInterfaces =
> > >
> ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers\\containers.haddock"],
> > > haddockHTMLs = ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers"]
> > >
> > > In fact, the installation location is c:/ghc/ghc-6.8.20070909/, not
> > > /usr/local.  I do have a failed partial ghc build (from darcs HEAD) at
> > > /usr/local from last week.  Perhaps there's some sticky info
> somewhere.
> > > [...]
> >
> > There was some confusion regarding build paths vs. installation paths in
> GHC's
> > build system. I think I've fixed most of this in the last few days, at
> least
> > I get a nice RPM on Linux now. Could you try to update to the bleeding
> edge
> > and rebuild? It would be good to have some Windows feedback.
>
> I think Conal is using the Windows bindist, which ought to be
> relocatable but the doc paths weren't. I'm looking into this.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ian
>
> ___
> Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
>
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs


Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-11 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote:
> > In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect
> > paths, such as
> >
> > haddockInterfaces =
> > ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers\\containers.haddock"],
> > haddockHTMLs = ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers"]
> >
> > In fact, the installation location is c:/ghc/ghc-6.8.20070909/, not
> > /usr/local.  I do have a failed partial ghc build (from darcs HEAD) at
> > /usr/local from last week.  Perhaps there's some sticky info somewhere.
> > [...]
> 
> There was some confusion regarding build paths vs. installation paths in 
> GHC's 
> build system. I think I've fixed most of this in the last few days, at least 
> I get a nice RPM on Linux now. Could you try to update to the bleeding edge 
> and rebuild? It would be good to have some Windows feedback.

I think Conal is using the Windows bindist, which ought to be
relocatable but the doc paths weren't. I'm looking into this.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs


Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-11 Thread Sven Panne
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote:
> In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect
> paths, such as
>
> haddockInterfaces =
> ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers\\containers.haddock"],
> haddockHTMLs = ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers"]
>
> In fact, the installation location is c:/ghc/ghc-6.8.20070909/, not
> /usr/local.  I do have a failed partial ghc build (from darcs HEAD) at
> /usr/local from last week.  Perhaps there's some sticky info somewhere.
> [...]

There was some confusion regarding build paths vs. installation paths in GHC's 
build system. I think I've fixed most of this in the last few days, at least 
I get a nice RPM on Linux now. Could you try to update to the bleeding edge 
and rebuild? It would be good to have some Windows feedback.

Cheers,
   S.
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs


Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-10 Thread Conal Elliott
In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect
paths, such as

haddockInterfaces =
["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers\\containers.haddock"],
haddockHTMLs = ["/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers"]

In fact, the installation location is c:/ghc/ghc-6.8.20070909/, not
/usr/local.  I do have a failed partial ghc build (from darcs HEAD) at
/usr/local from last week.  Perhaps there's some sticky info somewhere.

I tried to submit a bug report through
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket?type=bug, and I get back
"Permission Denied", although I am logged any.  Why might that be?

  - Conal
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs