#7471: Documentation bug: hs_init is incorrectly called in the example
-+--
Reporter: dsign | Owner: simonmar
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority
#7471: Documentation bug: hs_init is incorrectly called in the example
-+--
Reporter: dsign | Owner: simonmar
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority
#7471: Documentation bug: hs_init is incorrectly called in the example
-+--
Reporter: dsign | Owner: simonmar
Type: bug | Status: merge
Priority
#7471: Documentation bug: hs_init is incorrectly called in the example
+---
Reporter: dsign | Owner: simonmar
Type: bug| Status: closed
Priority
#7471: Documentation bug: hs_init is incorrectly called in the example
--+-
Reporter: dsign | Owner:
Type: bug| Status: new
Priority: normal
#7318: CONLIKE pragma documentation bug
+---
Reporter: acowley| Owner: igloo
Type: bug| Status: closed
Priority: normal
#7318: CONLIKE pragma documentation bug
-+--
Reporter: acowley | Owner: igloo
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone
#7318: CONLIKE pragma documentation bug
-+--
Reporter: acowley | Owner: igloo
Type: bug | Status: merge
Priority: normal| Milestone
#7318: CONLIKE pragma documentation bug
-+--
Reporter: acowley | Owner: igloo
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone
#7318: CONLIKE pragma documentation bug
-+--
Reporter: acowley | Owner: igloo
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone
#7318: CONLIKE pragma documentation bug
---+
Reporter: acowley| Owner:
Type: bug| Status: new
Priority: normal | Component
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:39:15PM +, Dominic Steinitz wrote:
The link on http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/hpc.html
to
http://www.haskell.org/hpc seems to be broken.
Thanks for the report. This has been fixed.
Thanks
Ian
The link on http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/hpc.html to
http://www.haskell.org/hpc seems to be broken.
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
#1311: newtypes of unboxed types disallowed - documentation bug and/or feature
request
+---
Reporter: Isaac Dupree |Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: low
#1311: newtypes of unboxed types disallowed - documentation bug and/or feature
request
---+
Reporter: Isaac Dupree | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal
#1311: newtypes of unboxed types disallowed - documentation bug and/or feature
request
-+--
Reporter: Isaac Dupree |Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal
#1235: Documentation bug: Control.Monad.Reader
---+
Reporter: bjpop | Owner:
Type: bug| Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone
#1235: Documentation bug: Control.Monad.Reader
--+-
Reporter: bjpop | Owner:
Type: bug| Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component
#935: Minor documentation bug, odd defn of fibn.
--+-
Reporter: tmcooper |Owner:
Type: bug| Status: closed
Priority: normal |Milestone
#935: Minor documentation bug, odd defn of fibn.
--+-
Reporter: tmcooper |Owner:
Type: bug| Status: reopened
Priority: normal |Milestone
#935: Minor documentation bug, odd defn of fibn.
--+-
Reporter: tmcooper |Owner:
Type: bug| Status: closed
Priority: normal |Milestone
#935: Minor documentation bug, odd defn of fibn.
-+--
Reporter: tmcooper |Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal|Milestone
#935: Minor documentation bug, odd defn of fibn.
+---
Reporter: tmcooper | Owner:
Type: bug| Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone
PROTECTED]
| Subject: Documentation bug? {Numeric,GHC.Float}.floatToDigits:
requires anon-negative argument
|
|
| The library report doesn't seem to mention this, but giving
floatToDigits a
| negative number leads to nonsensical answers:
|
| Prelude Numeric.floatToDigits 10 (-3.1415)
| ([-32,5,8,5
The library report doesn't seem to mention this, but giving floatToDigits a
negative number leads to nonsensical answers:
Prelude Numeric.floatToDigits 10 (-3.1415)
([-32,5,8,5],0)
Now, this probably makes perfect sense, but shouldn't the doco mention the
fact that floatToDigits requires a
while trying to adapt the local bootstrap-from-scratch script
that allows
us to install a somewhat customized GHC onto our systems starting from
nothing but an installed GCC 2.95, I noticed a bug in the
documentation
accompanying the GHC 6.2 release. On
Hello,
while trying to adapt the local bootstrap-from-scratch script that allows
us to install a somewhat customized GHC onto our systems starting from
nothing but an installed GCC 2.95, I noticed a bug in the documentation
accompanying the GHC 6.2 release. On
The online documentation of the concurrent package seems a
bit dated. I
just found out (by trial and error) that the functions
putCVar and getCVar
has changed names to readCVar and writerCVar. The name change
is great but
it would be nice if the documentation could reflect this.
Hi all!
The online documentation of the concurrent package seems a bit dated. I
just found out (by trial and error) that the functions putCVar and getCVar
has changed names to readCVar and writerCVar. The name change is great but
it would be nice if the documentation could reflect this.
Cheers,
29 matches
Mail list logo
