Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because I don't really have a clue if this is correct, some soothing
> words from Glasgow would be helpful... :-]
Ah, there, there :-)
--
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Glasgow
Sven Panne writes:
> My previous mail went our a little bit too early:
>
> Browsing through the compilation logs, I guess that %edi needs some
> fixup, too. So the mangler probably needs yet another line...
>
Yes, adding cases for %edi and %esi should account for code that gcc
might generate w
My previous mail went our a little bit too early:
Browsing through the compilation logs, I guess that %edi needs some
fixup, too. So the mangler probably needs yet another line...
--
Sven PanneTel.: +49/89/2178-2235
LMU, Institut fuer Informatik
In Oct 1997 I mailed the following bug report:
> [...]
> * During the compilation of the _mg-versions of the libs the
> assembler mangler complains about 5500 times. It's totally
> unclear to me what it means: bug/warning/error? Example:
> [...]
Sigbjorn replied:
> [...]
> gcc gener
