[ ghc-Bugs-644657 ] interface decl for PrelTup

2002-11-28 Thread noreply
obody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interface decl for PrelTup Initial Comment: My literate haskell script uses tupels with 38 elements. When using HUGS I get no errors and the script is running as wanted. Compiling with ghc-5.02.2 following error occurs: Switches_tupel.lhs

[ ghc-Bugs-644657 ] interface decl for PrelTup

2002-11-27 Thread noreply
d to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interface decl for PrelTup Initial Comment: My literate haskell script uses tupels with 38 elements. When using HUGS I get no errors and the script is running as wanted. Compiling with ghc-5.02.2 following error occurs: Switches_tupel.lhs:1: Failed to find in

Re: UnHappy 55 tuple [was: Re: PrelTup]

1998-06-18 Thread Manuel Chakravarty
Ooops, I forgot to attach the patches... --- Makefile.diff - *** ghc-3.01/Makefile Wed Jun 17 17:44:55 1998 --- MakefileWed Jun 17 17:38:23 1998 *** *** 63,69 PrelBase_HC_OPTS += -H12m PrelRead_HC_OP

Re: UnHappy 55 tuple [was: Re: PrelTup]

1998-06-18 Thread Manuel Chakravarty
#x27;ve often thought of making tuples > more generic, but it never seems worth the bother (which is, > belive me, non-trivial). Yes, I figure that it is a Tricky Thing. > You could do it yourself of course, or hack PrelTup... I did the latter and found that if I define a tuple with more

Re: UnHappy 55 tuple [was: Re: PrelTup]

1998-06-16 Thread Simon L Peyton Jones
ig tuples into nested smaller tuples... but I havn't gotten around to doing it. You could do it yourself of course, or hack PrelTup... Sorry about this. I hate it when compilers embody arbitrary limits. Simon

Re: UnHappy 55 tuple [was: Re: PrelTup]

1998-06-16 Thread Manuel Chakravarty
Hi Sigbjorn, I had another look at the 55 tuple problem. And this time, I could find a short program that produces the error. This main = let x = print "bla" in f (g x) f (x,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,

Re: UnHappy 55 tuple [was: Re: PrelTup]

1998-05-14 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Manuel Chakravarty writes: > Sigbjorn Finne wrote, > > > A 55-tuple no less :-) It arises from the compilation of a (big!) > > letrec of Happy parser states, and is a `bug' that has been fixed in > > later releases of ghc. I suggest picking up a more recent ghc binary > > dist, as extending ghc

UnHappy 55 tuple [was: Re: PrelTup]

1998-05-14 Thread Manuel Chakravarty
Sigbjorn Finne wrote, > A 55-tuple no less :-) It arises from the compilation of a (big!) > letrec of Happy parser states, and is a `bug' that has been fixed in > later releases of ghc. I suggest picking up a more recent ghc binary > dist, as extending ghc to cope with 55 tuples will require twea

Re: PrelTup

1998-04-20 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Manuel Chakravarty writes: > Hi Glaswegians, > > [This is not necessarily a bug; nevertheless, any advice > would be appreciated.] > > During linking of a (big) Happy generate file, I ended up > with a linker message like > > KCParser.o(.text+0x41a9f): undefined reference to `PrelTup_Z40Z44..

PrelTup

1998-04-20 Thread Manuel Chakravarty
Hi Glaswegians, [This is not necessarily a bug; nevertheless, any advice would be appreciated.] During linking of a (big) Happy generate file, I ended up with a linker message like KCParser.o(.text+0x41a9f): undefined reference to `PrelTup_Z40Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44Z44