Re: fptools/configure thinks happy 1.10 < 1.9

2001-01-27 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Volker Stolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > My happy is 1.10, everything fresh from cvs: > ---> > checking for happy... /home/stolz/Linux/haskell/ghc-4.08.1/bin/happy > checking for version of happy... > Happy version 1.9 or later is required to compile GHC. > <--- > > And in a sense, it is right. I

Re: fptools/configure thinks happy 1.10 < 1.9

2001-01-26 Thread Michael Weber
[ Volker, is your Mail-Followup-To:-header intended like this? ] * Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-01-26T14:57+0100]: [ configure thinks: happy-1.10 < happy-1.9 ] > And in a sense, it is right. I'd really like to come up with a fix, but > I guess... [ perl thingy ] > > perl vers.pl "1.9

Re: fptools/configure thinks happy 1.10 < 1.9

2001-01-26 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:57:58 +0100, Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > ...is too long for a perl one-liner in configure. perl -e '@v = map {join "", map {chr} split /\./} @ARGV; exit ($v[0] ge $v[1] ? 0 : 1)' 1.10 1.9 # Returns 0, i.e. the second version is at least as high as the

fptools/configure thinks happy 1.10 < 1.9

2001-01-26 Thread Volker Stolz
My happy is 1.10, everything fresh from cvs: ---> checking for happy... /home/stolz/Linux/haskell/ghc-4.08.1/bin/happy checking for version of happy... Happy version 1.9 or later is required to compile GHC. <--- And in a sense, it is right. I'd really like to come up with a fix, but I guess...