On 25 July 2005 02:25, Duncan Coutts wrote:
The :tags for ghci feature that recently went into cvs:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2005-June/025436.html
means that unfortunately saying:
t blah
now complains that :t is ambiguous because it could be :tags or :type.
I think
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 11:53 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 25 July 2005 02:25, Duncan Coutts wrote:
The :tags for ghci feature that recently went into cvs:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2005-June/025436.html
means that unfortunately saying:
t blah
now complains
All,
The :tags for ghci feature that recently went into cvs:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2005-June/025436.html
means that unfortunately saying:
:t blah
now complains that :t is ambiguous because it could be :tags or :type.
I think this may upset people! :-) People are very used
