> Maybe there should be a standard place to put Haskell interfaces and
> libraries/objects. As there can be many modules in a package and thus
> many interfaces, and collisions between module names are harmless in
> a case where both are not used in the same program, interfaces should
> probably g
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:24:34 +0100, George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> The latest binary distribution puts the GHC include files in
> "lib/ghc-4.06/includes", not "lib/includes" as older versions used to.
Don't know about binary dists, but I compiled 4.06 from source and
it did install dir
> The latest binary distribution puts the GHC include files in
> "lib/ghc-4.06/includes", not "lib/includes" as older versions used to.
> This is a nuisance, because it means that there isn't any way a
> Makefile can refer to the includes without coding in the GHC version.
> Or is there? One nee
The latest binary distribution puts the GHC include files in
"lib/ghc-4.06/includes", not "lib/includes" as older versions used to.
This is a nuisance, because it means that there isn't any way a
Makefile can refer to the includes without coding in the GHC version.
Or is there? One needs access t
