Thanks, Tom & Manuel. I've put them on the web page.
| There are now also x86 RPMS for RedHat Linux 6.2 at
|
|
| ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/users/chak/jibunmaki/i386-rh6.2/
| ghc-5.00-2.i386.rpm
|
| ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/users/chak/jibunmaki/i386-rh6.2/
| ghc-prof-5.00-2.i386.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 15:00:08 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:15:39 +1000, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> >
> > > The source tar ball misses the configure scripts (it has the
> > > `configure.in's, but the source tar ball should be
> > > autoconf'
This sounds good. One question: Can this live gracefully with
an already complete Cygwin installation? I.e., will I automatically
end up with two versions of bash, mv, cp, and so on, and can they
live together?
Thanks,
John Velman
Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@haskell.org on 04/23/20
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:36:09 +0100, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> The correct way to implement timeout in GHC 5.00 is below. This should
> really be in a library somewhere.
IMHO "unique exceptions" should be factored out and available in a
standalone way.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:45:45 -0500, Matt Harden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> I think I may have found a way to get zip & friends to fuse with *both*
> of their input lists.
I tried to put in PrelList, changed foldr2_both to use a local
recursive function which doesn't pass k around which allows to
The correct way to implement timeout in GHC 5.00 is below. This should
really be in a library somewhere.
This implementation works for GHC's current "blocking" semantics for
throwTo, but if we change the semantics of throwTo to match the
asynchronous exceptions paper
(http://www.haskell.org/~sim
Hi Matt,
> I think I may have found a way to get zip & friends to fuse with *both*
> of their input lists.
> ...
> I have no idea
> what kind of code this would actually end up creating.
However, that is the important point. The goal of deforestation/fusion
is to optimise a program. Removing da
> Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:15:39 +1000, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
> > The source tar ball misses the configure scripts (it has the
> > `configure.in's, but the source tar ball should be
> > autoconf'ed, shouldn't it?)
>
> BTW, IMHO 'make maintainer-clean' should not del
> Also, less importantly, how do I generate packages? I have a bunch of
> .o files (modules) all compiled using -package-name and -c,
> but I can't
> find the correct ghc flag to link them into a library (.a/Linux).
You use the usual 'ar' tool for making a .a library, something like:
$
I've uploaded a new InstallShield for GHC 4.08.2 for Windows which includes
*all* the programs required to use and even rebuild GHC from source [GHC
developers should note that it doesn't include everything needed to build
from CVS; see the most recent 5.00 docs in CVS for details]. This means tha
10 matches
Mail list logo