> The bootstrapping host.
That is expected, then. I've mentioned before that trying to build the
HC files on the bootstrapping host might not work, because these files
are meant to be built on the target. The same goes for the invocation
of gcc itself: it is using flags designed for use on the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:52:07AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> > Things aren't so easy with alpha as gcc rejects the -mieee
> > flag when GHC
> > calls gcc for -cpp'ing. I fear a nasty hacky wrapper may be in order.
>
> Is this when running gcc on the Alpha, or on the bootstrapping host?
Th
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:21:29PM +1000, Matt Chapman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:06:57AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> >
> > Bootstrapping IA64 from x86 (with numerous patches from CVS) looks
> > like it is working fine, although I am getting
> >
> > ghc-6.0.1(9371): unaligned access to 0x
simonmar:
>
> > Things aren't so easy with alpha as gcc rejects the -mieee
> > flag when GHC
> > calls gcc for -cpp'ing. I fear a nasty hacky wrapper may be in order.
>
> Is this when running gcc on the Alpha, or on the bootstrapping host?
alpha-dec-osf3 bootstrapped quite cleanly today. Using
> Things aren't so easy with alpha as gcc rejects the -mieee
> flag when GHC
> calls gcc for -cpp'ing. I fear a nasty hacky wrapper may be in order.
Is this when running gcc on the Alpha, or on the bootstrapping host?
Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgo
Sigbjorn Finne, still.
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Behalf Of ? ?? ??
| Sent: 11 September 2003 08:17
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Who supports HaskellDirect now?
|
| Hello!
|
| Who supports HaskellDirect now?
|
Hello!
Who supports HaskellDirect now?
Best wishes.
Kostya Lukin
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
