Henrik Nilsson wrote:
But different people may have different opinions [...]
... and this is concisely stated in Wadler's Law of Language Design.
(http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/~mh/curry/listarchive/0017.html :-)
Seriously, I don't really care on what we agree here, it's only a minor
issue. My
1.- OK. The distrib/hc-build migth not handle the
dependencies soundly.
What do you mean here? Could you elaborate?
Now I build on the target T as in the host H:
cd hslibs/ gmake boot gmake
cd ghc gmake boot gmake
The touch config.h patch seems to solve the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moreover, there is only one first
line, and assuming some kind of language pragma is introduced, and assuming
Simon Marlow goes ahead and introduces GHC_OPTIONS, and the other
implementors goes ahead and introduces HUGS_OPTIONS,
Numerous additions to configure/configure.in. I can add these
in CVS, but I'm not sure if I should add
+s390-ibm-linux*)
+ HostPlatform=s390-ibm-linux
+ TargetPlatform=s390-ibm-linux #hack
+ BuildPlatform=s390-ibm-linux #hack
+HostPlatform_CPP='s390_ibm_linux'
Would it not be better to have control over exactly where these options apply,
could you not have:
{-# OPTIONS fallow-overlapping-instances=true #-}
... some code ...
{-# OPTIONS -fallow-overlapping-instances=false #-}
... more code ...
So you can ensure instances you don't want overlapping
Ian Lynagh writes:
echo SGMLDocWays := html dvi ps mk/build.mk
This works great! Is there any chance I can extend this technique so
that it will include the documentation of, say happy, haddock, and
alex as well?
The same technique works for Happy, Haddock Alex, except that some
OPTIONS pragmas are only looked for at the top of your source files,
upto the first (non-literate,non-empty) line not containing
OPTIONS.
Why doesn't non-empty include comment-only lines?
One concrete reason for this is that the code which looks for '{-#
OPTIONS' isn't the full
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:27:19 +0100
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could make it understand comments, but that adds extra
complication (nested comments, maximal munch for '--' comments, etc.).
Hmm.
Nested comments yes, I see how that'd be a problem.
But surely it wouldn't be hard
Good Day,
With warm heart I offer my friendship, and my greetings,
and I hope this letter meets you in good time. It will
be surprising to you to receive this proposal from me
since you do not know me personally.
However, I am sincerely seeking your confidence in this
transaction, which I
