Hey all,
Some mips64 and gmp observations:
The normal way, unregisterised, with the in-tree gmp, v3.1.1:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Fri Oct 24 17:17:56 PDT 2003
1070 total tests, which gave rise to
1070 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failures
Hi all,
sorry if it's a FAQ or I'm simply too dumb to look in the right places.
What I want to do is to send Haskell values over a network to another
Haskell process. Or save a Haskell value on disk and read it in in a
later incarnation of the same pogram, or with a different program.
Is
I think the standard way would be to use Show and Read and then
send/write/rcv/read strings from the network/disk. Or you could use the
Binary class to get binary representations, but these (sometimes,
depending on which implementation you use) have endianness issues if
you're transmitting
Dear colleagues,
In GHC/FFI, is there some way (is it possible ?) to
access DIRECTLY an array of UArray type (immutable) in a
sequential contiguous memory buffer (in C side, for
example) without to need to copy the array elements one
by one ? GHC hackers and implementors are wellcome... :-)
My
Dear GHC users,
I am
using GHC profilling tooland I think you can help me to answer a
(apparently) simple question:
When I
compilemy program without "-prof -auto-all" option (no profiling
support),its execution time is about 140s (compiled with -O2). When
compiled with profiling
AFAIK, no. That's the whole point of StorableArrays. Why can't you use
these instead of UArrays?
- Hal
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, heron_carvalho wrote:
Dear colleagues,
In GHC/FFI, is there some way (is it possible ?) to
access DIRECTLY an array of UArray type (immutable) in a
