Re: Announce: hs-plugins-0.9.6

2004-08-16 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
claus.reinke: > Don, > > thanks for your answers - that looks very promising. > > > Only as these are the systems that I've tested on, or that others have. > > I don't have access to a Windows machine. hs-plugins should only be > > limited to platforms with a working GHC dynamic loader, which is

Re: Announce: hs-plugins-0.9.6

2004-08-16 Thread John Meacham
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:17:31PM +0100, MR K P SCHUPKE wrote: > >There is a portable System.Process library here: > > On that note, perhaps all signals on unix should be > set to ignore, so if you are writing cross platform > code you don't have to do special stuff with say > sigPIPE for exampl

RE: Announce: hs-plugins-0.9.6

2004-08-16 Thread MR K P SCHUPKE
>There is a portable System.Process library here: On that note, perhaps all signals on unix should be set to ignore, so if you are writing cross platform code you don't have to do special stuff with say sigPIPE for example Keean. ___ Glasgow-ha

RE: Announce: hs-plugins-0.9.6

2004-08-16 Thread Simon Marlow
On 16 August 2004 15:37, Carsten Schultz wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote: >> a cursory browse of the sources shows up things like "POpen" and >> "Posix", both no-nos, as far as portable ghc code is concerned (no >> longer supported in the default ghc

Re: Announce: hs-plugins-0.9.6

2004-08-16 Thread Carsten Schultz
Hi! On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote: > a cursory browse of the sources shows up things like "POpen" and "Posix", > both no-nos, as far as portable ghc code is concerned (no longer supported > in the default ghc for windows, AFAIK). it would be good if ghc-users would >

Re: Announce: hs-plugins-0.9.6

2004-08-16 Thread Claus Reinke
Don, thanks for your answers - that looks very promising. > Only as these are the systems that I've tested on, or that others have. > I don't have access to a Windows machine. hs-plugins should only be > limited to platforms with a working GHC dynamic loader, which is all the > systems I've teste

RE: isEmptyChan, System.Posix.Signals

2004-08-16 Thread Simon Marlow
On 16 August 2004 11:21, MR K P SCHUPKE wrote: > I thought NT and more recent was Posix compliant... Surely it should > support posix signals? Don't believe the hype. As I understand it, NT has a POSIX subsystem, which is entirely separate from the Win32 subsystem - you can't run a process which

RE: isEmptyChan, System.Posix.Signals

2004-08-16 Thread MR K P SCHUPKE
I thought NT and more recent was Posix compliant... Surely it should support posix signals? Keean. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

RE: main thread GC'd on ^C

2004-08-16 Thread Simon Marlow
On 13 August 2004 17:46, Hal Daume III wrote: > When I Control-C to stop a running program, I get: > > recomputeLambdaProb: internal error: main thread has been GC'd > Please report this as a bug to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > or http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/ghc/ > > which I understand,

RE: isEmptyChan, System.Posix.Signals

2004-08-16 Thread Simon Marlow
On 14 August 2004 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 2. System.Posix.Signals does not export anything on my windows > installation: > > Prelude System.Posix.Signals> :b System.Posix.Signals > > Prelude System.Posix.Signals> > > I wanted to include 'installHandler sigPIPE Ignore Nothing' (as > m