Re: Change in ghc-6.2.2 distribution files

Hi Sven, Yes, that would be it. The change is harmless enough. Thanks for the pointer to the message. Greg On Oct 23, 2004, at 3:01 PM, Sven Panne wrote: Gregory Wright wrote: Did the file ghc-6.2.2.tar.bz2 get changed without the version number being changed? The md5 sum of the files has changed,

Re: Change in ghc-6.2.2 distribution files

Gregory Wright wrote: Did the file ghc-6.2.2.tar.bz2 get changed without the version number being changed? The md5 sum of the files has changed, breaking the darwinports and presumably the *BSD ports builds as well. I didn't see any notice to the list, so I'm not sure if the change is intentional,

Re: Mutable hash?

On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:17:20AM -0400, Robert Dockins wrote: > There is a hashtable in the IO monad: > > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Data.HashTable.html Why is it in IO instead of the more general ST? IMHO _all_ mutable data structures should be written for ST (o

Change in ghc-6.2.2 distribution files

Hi, Did the file ghc-6.2.2.tar.bz2 get changed without the version number being changed? The md5 sum of the files has changed, breaking the darwinports and presumably the *BSD ports builds as well. I didn't see any notice to the list, so I'm not sure if the change is intentional, or if the wrong

setCurrentDirectory and lightweight threads

Hello fellow Haskelleers, I've come upon a problem that sort of bites me. I'm writing a multithreaded webserver in which pages are dynamically loaded haskell applications. The main server loop listens for incoming requests and distributes these to request handlers, each running in a separate ligh