On 22 December 2005 13:43, Christian Maeder wrote:
for storing highly shared data structures we use so called Annotated
Terms (shortly ATerms, details below).
http://www.cwi.nl/htbin/sen1/twiki/bin/view/SEN1/ATerm
In contrast to the Binary (or GhcBinary) class we compute the sharing,
On 20 December 2005 16:19, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:50:02PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
On 2005-12-19, Malcolm Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ross Paterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But how about having a separate repository for each library
package?
Seconded.
On 17 December 2005 16:21, Einar Karttunen wrote:
What is the preferred way of submitting patches at the moment?
I tried using Trac but it seems that users without an account
on haskell.org cannot attach files... Is using Trac and
linking to the patch hosted externally the way to go?
I
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:45:54PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
How about
retryIfEarlierThan / retryIfLaterThan
retryIfBefore / retryIfAfter
I like making it clear that the operation behaves like retry given
certain conditions.
I like these proposals! Thanks!
I think I prefer the
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But how about having a separate repository for each library
package?
The time to mention this would have been a few weeks ago when I proposed
the current scheme :-)
Err, I think I did...
I think it /would/ actually be nicer to split up the
