On 18 March 2006 18:32, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:24:14PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
If you have anything else for 6.4.2, please let me know.
Just a small thing, but it looks like, while the HEAD has been changed
to send --help output to stdout, ghc-6.4.2.20060316 still
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
To my request on GHC-6.4.1 for SuSE 10.0
Christian Maeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 17 Mar 2006
First, we install it to the system area from binary found on the GHC www
page as
Binary x86, Generic Linux with glib 2.3.
This binary is not for a
Is it possible to create a RULES that fires only if a type has a given
class constraint? something like:
snub :: Ord a = [a] - [a]
snub xs = f Set.empty xs where
f _ [] = []
f (x:xs) set
| x `Set.member` set = f xs
| otherwise = x:f xs (Set.insert x set)
{-# RULES
Thank you.
We have now managed to install it.
[..]
To my request on GHC-6.4.1 for SuSE 10.0
[..]
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.0.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find -lreadline
you may try:
Definitely not at present, and I see no easy way to implement it.
RULES are implemented by simple matching in Core. A call to nub will have an
Eq dictionary, but Core knows nothing of instance declarations, and has no clue
how to make an Ord dictionary. But an Ord dictionary is what you want
Hello John,
Monday, March 20, 2006, 2:49:14 PM, you wrote:
JM Is it possible to create a RULES that fires only if a type has a given
JM class constraint? something like:
snub :: Ord a = [a] - [a]
snub xs = f Set.empty xs where
f _ [] = []
f (x:xs) set
| x `Set.member` set =
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:09:41PM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Definitely not at present, and I see no easy way to implement it.
RULES are implemented by simple matching in Core. A call to nub will
have an Eq dictionary, but Core knows nothing of instance
declarations, and has no clue
