You don't want (map q' (range dom)) to be computed for each call of q,
do you. To make GHC realise that this expression does not depend on the
arguments, you need the full laziness transformation, which you get
with -0.
GHCi doesn't use -O, though. So do this
ghc -c Foo.hs -O
Hi,
I am trying to build ghc-6.4.2 under solaris x86 (10.0).
I mainly followed
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/building/sec-porting-ghc.html,
but now I am stuck.
I managed to build an unregistered ghc at the target. I build the .hc
files on a x86 Linux box. It compiles hello world
Hi,
I forgot one thing:
at the solaris x86 system is a ghc-6.2 already installed.
Via start script it uses -fvia-C.
So building 6.4.2 with it give me a different error:
# PATH=/var/tmp/gsauthof/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:$PATH ./configure
--with-gcc=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc --with-ghc=/vol/ghc-6.2/bin/ghc
On 29.04 17:47, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build ghc-6.4.2 under solaris x86 (10.0).
Hello
A few months ago physrules ported GHC 6.4.1 to solaris x86.
There were a few problems (and the tarball does not have
the install target fixed), but the binary should work.
Hopefully this
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 16:37 -0700 schrieb John Meacham:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:28:01PM -0700, John Meacham wrote:
I was curious if ghc could support the following basic types, they will
likely just be aliases of existing types.
WordPtr uintptr_t
WordMax uintmax_t
IntPtr
Some more bad news...
The Cabal hooks interface from 6.4.2 is pretty different from the
current darcs head. The differences were to make things more
consistent and less likely to change in the future. I can't see
really going back to the version that's in 6.4.2. I fear that'll make
the problem
