Donn Cave wrote:
I'm building GHC on NetBSD-amd64, and among other things
need to deal with the problem described in #2305 - native
code misses the __RENAME (__asm) directive in NetBSD include
files, and ends up linking to the wrong externals. The
author of #2305 reports that -fvia-C avoids
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a metoo:
a nicely working Parallel Haskell
would be a very strong selling point,
and I'm especially thinking of education here.
If I could show to my students that just by inserting a few
'par' (or similar) annotations in the source
they can
| The most substantial problem is that the threaded RTS in GHC 6.8.2 is
| very crashy in the face of par: about 90% of my runs fail with a
| segfault or an assertion failure. Simon Marlow mentioned that this bug
| is fixed, but I've been unsuccessful in building a GHC 6.8.3 release
|
For those without root rights I've made a plain distribution that relies
on gmp and readline under /opt/local/ (for 9.3.0 Darwin Kernel)
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbkb/forschung/formal_methods/CoFI/hets/intel-mac/ghcs/ghc-6.8.2.20080603-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
Christian
Manuel M
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
There's a 6.8.3 release candidate you might be able to try.
Yes, I reported a bug and Simon mentioned that it ought to be fixed
already. I've been trying to build snapshots for about a week :-)
b
___
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
There's a 6.8.3 release candidate you might be able to try.
Yes, I reported a bug and Simon mentioned that it ought to be fixed
already. I've been trying to build snapshots for about a week :-)
And we appreciate the bug reports. Is it
Simon Marlow wrote:
Is it just the Haddock 2 problem
you're having now?
I switched back to Haddock 0.8, and found a new problem at installation
time: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2343
This is a change in behaviour from 6.8.2, and I'm not really sure what
to do about it.
I've attached a log of the 'make install' on advice from Igloo.
I get the following when trying to building from source with the documentation
install enabled:
#Hacks:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 base/dist/doc/html/*/*.css
/usr/local/share/doc/ghc/libraries
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat
Hello Neil,
Thursday, June 5, 2008, 8:54:51 PM, you wrote:
PS Why isn't Functor derivable?
Derive can do it: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~ndm/derive
I believe that Twan (the author of Functor deriving in Derive) is
trying to get this suggested for Haskell' as a proper deriving.
dear GHC
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:23:36 -0700
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It looks like, in base anyway, this actually goes in a .h file,
to a pattern like
... ah, never mind that, I see those wrappers are not the sort I need.
--
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I've been doing some work with mutually recursive modules (MRMs). I'm
familiar with the section in the User's Guide on how to do this and have
successfully worked with MRMs with simple dependencies. However, I have
created a set of MRMs that I can't seem to get to compile because of
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Richard Giraud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the current {-# SOURCE #-}/.hs-boot scheme allow for compilation of
arbitrary MRMs? Or are there known cases where it doesn't work? If there
are cases where it doesn't work, are there other options?
I don't think
Antoine Latter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Richard Giraud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the current {-# SOURCE #-}/.hs-boot scheme allow for compilation of
arbitrary MRMs? Or are there known cases where it doesn't work? If there
are cases where it doesn't work, are there other
13 matches
Mail list logo
