Peter Hercek wrote:
pepe wrote:
Having (a kind of messy approximation of) a dynamic stack is possible
with a variant of the cost center stacks mechanism used for profiling.
But the downside is that code and libraries would need to be compiled
for debugging.
Is there any info somewhere why the
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 10:11 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:49 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Does this version work from ghci?
-- Lennart
Specifically I believe Lennart is asking about Windows. It's worked in
ghci in
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 08:47 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Duncan Coutts wrote:
Maybe. Dealing with linker scripts properly is probably rather tricky
and we get it for free when we switch to shared libraries.
I don't follow this last point - how does switching to shared libraries for
Hi all,
Simon Marlow has recently posted a patch that adds Unicode support to
Handle I/O. He mentioned that it didn't work yet on Windows so i was
thinking of looking at the source code to see how the new Unicode
support works and perhaps try to make it work on Windows.
I have built GHC from
(compiled with ghc 6.10 with options -O2 -ddump-simpl)
I was wondering why lvl_s1mF is not being inlined into a_s1Gv in the core at
the bottom of this email as that is the only place it is ever referenced.
It also seems the extra levels of indirection are defeating the strictness
analyzer on
Pepe Iborra wrote:
- Regarding your :logLocal, you should rename it to :stepLocal, open a
ticket, and attach your patch. We should really try to get this into
6.10.2.
Ach, I missed I'm supposed to do this first time I read the message.
I'll get to it at worst during this weekend.
2009/2/17 Tyson Whitehead twhiteh...@gmail.com:
(compiled with ghc 6.10 with options -O2 -ddump-simpl)
I was wondering why lvl_s1mF is not being inlined into a_s1Gv in the core at
the bottom of this email as that is the only place it is ever referenced.
The relevant GHC code is
On February 17, 2009 19:24:44 Max Bolingbroke wrote:
2009/2/17 Tyson Whitehead twhiteh...@gmail.com:
It also seems the extra levels of indirection are defeating the
strictness analyzer on eta_s1CN in a_s1Gv as all code branches either
directly force it or ultimately pass it to digit_s1l3 as
On February 17, 2009 19:24:44 Max Bolingbroke wrote:
2009/2/17 Tyson Whitehead twhiteh...@gmail.com:
(compiled with ghc 6.10 with options -O2 -ddump-simpl)
That should have been -ddump-stranal instead of -ddump-simpl.
I was wondering why lvl_s1mF is not being inlined into a_s1Gv in the core
Peter Hercek wrote:
Also there does not seem to be a demand for ghciext package so I'm not
Hi Peter.. just to note that I haven't had the need/time yet to try it,
but I'm very thankful for the work you and Pepe are doing to make ghci
more powerful. It's a very useful tool for learning about
10 matches
Mail list logo
