Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:13 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
This sounds like a chicken and egg problem. To know which package
include directories to use GHCi needs to know which packages your module
uses. However to work out which packages it needs it has to load the
module
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 08:53 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:13 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Yes, if we know we're using it. If we specify -package blah on the
command line then we do know we're using it and everything works
(because ghc uses the
GHC 6.10.2 will have a problem with cabal-install-0.6.2!
When I tried to install cabal-install-0.6.2 for ghc-6.10.1.20090314
I needed to change #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash in bootstrap.sh to avoid the
following errors:
-bash-3.00$ ./bootstrap.sh
Checking installed packages for
Dear all,
It seems that the front page of the developer wiki is rather
out-of-date. Considering that 6.10.2 is now at rc1-stage, I was rather
hoping to find some updated notes on release plans for 6.10.2 and what
will be in 6.12, but those notices are still at 6.8.3 and 6.10, resp.
On another
Christian Maeder wrote:
Testsuite results are bad for ghc-6.10.1.20090314, see
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3106
Patch for the cygpath not found issue is attached to the ticket. Please
(Windows/Cygwin/Mingw users especially) test it.
Thanks,
Karel
Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
It seems that the front page of the developer wiki is rather
out-of-date. Considering that 6.10.2 is now at rc1-stage, I was rather
hoping to find some updated notes on release plans for 6.10.2 and what
will be in 6.12, but those notices are still at 6.8.3 and
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
I have tested ghc-6.10.1.20090314 on Debian Linux, i386-unknown,
on
making from source by ghc-6.10.1, making itself from source, DoCon.
It looks all right.
Thanks Serge!
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
Hi everyone. I'm trying to build GHC 6.8.3 on a Solaris 8 machine. I'd
love to upgrade Solaris to 10, which I believe would solve the problem I'm
having by making /usr/lib/libm.so.2 available, but that's not an option at
this time.
Here's the output of uname -a on the system.
SunOS bwddev1 5.8
Ralph Crawford wrote:
ln -s /usr/lib/libm.so.1 $BOS_ROOT/lib/libm.so.2
You need an actual libm.so.2 library that contains the missing symbols.
To this library you set a link libm.so in a directory that is in the
front of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so that libm.so.2 instead of libm.so.1 is
found via
On 2009 Mar 17, at 10:36, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ralph Crawford wrote:
ln -s /usr/lib/libm.so.1 $BOS_ROOT/lib/libm.so.2
You need an actual libm.so.2 library that contains the missing
symbols.
To this library you set a link libm.so in a directory that is in the
front of your
I have just downloaded a darcs snapshot, pulled patches and followed
the instructions at
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/QuickStart
When I got to do
make
it didn't work. The tail of the output looks like this:
[55 of 55] Compiling Main ( cabal-bin.hs,
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
GHC 6.10.2 will have a problem with cabal-install-0.6.2!
When I tried to install cabal-install-0.6.2 for ghc-6.10.1.20090314
I needed to change #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash in bootstrap.sh to avoid the
following errors:
-bash-3.00$
On 2009 Mar 17, at 20:28, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Under Solaris sh is not bash!
Indeed.
According to the OpenGroup that syntax should be fine:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_09_02
It
13 matches
Mail list logo
