On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:34 +, Gracjan Polak wrote:
Duncan Coutts duncan.coutts at googlemail.com writes:
if flag(test)
Buildable: True
Build-depends: base5, bytestring, HUnit, directory
else
Buildable: False
Is this solution good for the time being? If
I think, libgmp.so* should be available under /usr/lib64/ if you use ghc.
There are rpm packages, i.e. SuSE
gmp-4.2.1-58
gmp-devel-4.2.1-58
In order to create binaries with libgmp being statically linked in, it
is possible to copy libgmp.a into ghc'c libdir so that those binaries
can run on
Christian Maeder schrieb:
I think, libgmp.so* should be available under /usr/lib64/ if you use ghc.
There are rpm packages, i.e. SuSE
gmp-4.2.1-58
gmp-devel-4.2.1-58
In order to create binaries with libgmp being statically linked in, it
is possible to copy libgmp.a into ghc'c libdir
2009/12/19 Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name:
I want to build ghc for i586-alt-linux-gnu.
Why? :)
Why do not use config.guess to guess correct host/target/build
instead of reinvent wheel?
While I sympathize (I gave up long ago trying to use host/target/build
with ghc - we use them by
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Bas van Dijk v.dijk@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Robert Greayer robgrea...@gmail.com wrote:
There's been some improvement at least in 6.12.1, see:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2395
Thanks for pointing me to the ticket!
Hi all,
I stumbled upon something odd with respect to arrays. I know about GHC not
doing card marking and traversing whole arrays one each GC for each array with
alterations, but still I don't understand the behaviour.
The situation is like this. I am building a compiler. This compiler
