Re: -K in 6.12.2

2010-04-23 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
I am sorry, please withdraw my last letter (about -M, -K): For the test compiled under -O, 2300k in ./Main +RTS -K2300k -RTS is the minimal memory option of this kind for the test to finish without break. [..] I have confused -M...k with -K...k. Regards, - Serge

Re: FFI calls: is it possible to allocate a small memory block on a stack?

2010-04-23 Thread Simon Marlow
On 23/04/2010 04:39, Denys Rtveliashvili wrote: OK, the code I have checked out from the repository contains this in rts/sm/Storage.h: extern bdescr * pinned_object_block; And in rts/sm/Storage.c: bdescr *pinned_object_block; Ah, I was looking in the HEAD, where I've already fixed

London HUG domain expired

2010-04-23 Thread Bayley, Alistair
From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Denys Rtveliashvili On the side note, is London HUG still active? The website seems to be down... Looks like the London HUG domain (londonhug.net) registration has expired.

GHC version 6.12.2 - testsuite results

2010-04-23 Thread Jens Petersen
Hi, FYI I just ran the full testsuite (my first time) on a fedora devel build for Fedora 14 and got the following results: * i686 (all) OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at gum agd 23 7:20:47 saaku UTC 2010 2375 total tests, which gave rise to 13152 test cases, of which 0

Re: GHC version 6.12.2 - testsuite results

2010-04-23 Thread Simon Marlow
On 23/04/2010 11:47, Jens Petersen wrote: Hi, FYI I just ran the full testsuite (my first time) on a fedora devel build for Fedora 14 and got the following results: * i686 (all) OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at gum agd 23 7:20:47 saaku UTC 2010 2375 total tests, which gave rise

Re: index*OffAddr

2010-04-23 Thread Simon Marlow
On 21/04/2010 09:45, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote: After thinking about this for a while, I came up with two possible solutions. One is to provide a pure version of touch#: use# :: o - o' - o' such that use# x y = y. This would change the code above to: I# (use# arr# (indexIntOffAddr#

Re: FFI calls: is it possible to allocate a small memory block on a stack?

2010-04-23 Thread Denys Rtveliashvili
Hi Simon, OK, the code I have checked out from the repository contains this in rts/sm/Storage.h: extern bdescr * pinned_object_block; And in rts/sm/Storage.c: bdescr *pinned_object_block; Ah, I was looking in the HEAD, where I've already fixed this by moving

Re: FFI calls: is it possible to allocate a small memory block on a stack?

2010-04-23 Thread Denys Rtveliashvili
Bertram, It appears that I am on 6.12. Strange, as I thought I have check-out the HEAD by following the instructions on the wiki: darcs get --partial http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc The wiki does not tell explicitly what will be checked out, so I expected it to be HEAD. With kind

three dots of :browse

2010-04-23 Thread 山本和彦
Hello, If I use :browse a module with GHC 6.12, it sometimes displays garbage. Here is an example: Prelude :browse Data.IP data AddrRange a = iproute-0.2.0:Data.IP.Range.AddrRange {addr :: a, mask :: a, mlen