On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 02:37:04PM -0700, Evan Laforge wrote:
I don't think there's anything magic about the name. The tricky thing
about uninstallation is detecting when you uninstalled the currently
active version (as defined by the plain 'ghc' symlinks and thy
Current symlink), and
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:26:21PM -0400, Alex Suraci wrote:
I've got Atomo up and running on GHC 7 now. Very nice performance
boosts! Plus memory appears to be freed, though I can't test loading
as it panics:
atomo $ atomo
load: src/empty.hs
atomo: atomo: panic! (the
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:23:59PM -0700, Alexander Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/10/2010 05:22, Alexander Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Simon Marlowmarlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2010 03:23, Alexander
I've pushed patches to do this, and also added the full GHC version and
arch (i386/x86_64) to the framework version number.
One annoyance is that if you have 7.1.20101023-i386 installed, then
7.1.20101022-i386 won't actually install any files (Console's log gave
something to the effect of
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 04:21:29PM -0700, Evan Laforge wrote:
I've pushed patches to do this, and also added the full GHC version and
arch (i386/x86_64) to the framework version number.
One annoyance is that if you have 7.1.20101023-i386 installed, then
7.1.20101022-i386 won't actually
