On 07/12/2010 21:30, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Simon Marlowmarlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but semantics are different. I want to tolerate some exception
because they are saying I should do this and this (for example user
interrupt, or timeout) but I do not want others,
On 10/12/2010 16:49, Karel Gardas wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to recover my opensolaris builder machine after disk crash,
but after reinstall I'm not able to build any GHC there. I'm trying head
and now also 6.12.3 as a reference (as I'm able to build it on my
workstation with the same OS). The
On 16 December 2010 10:02, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
ghc-cabal: Missing dependency on a foreign library:
* Missing header file: HsBase.h
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system package that
provides this library (you may need the -dev version). If the library
Duncan and Simon,
thank you very much for dealing with this. After adding -v3 to the
ghc-cabal invocation it reported gcc error on HsBase.h due to missing
math.h file, i.e. system/library/math/header-math package was not
installed yet.
Thanks!
Karel
On 12/16/10 11:16 AM, Duncan Coutts
Hello!
I attach a program which I suspect demonstrates a bug in GHC. The
important lines are:
showType :: forall a . Expr a - String
showType (Lit _) = show (typeOf (undefined :: a))
test1 = showType (mk :: Expr BOOL) -- Prints Bool (wrong?)
test2 = showType (Lit mk :: Expr BOOL)
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.0.2:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.2-rc1/
This includes the source tarball, installers for OS X and Windows, and
bindists for amd64/Linux, i386/Linux, amd64/FreeBSD and i386/FreeBSD.
Please test as much as possible;
Way to go!
Are there tentative release notes, so I know what to look for?
Thanks,
Antoine
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.0.2:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.2-rc1/
This includes
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've thought about whether we could support resumption in the past. It's
extremely difficult to implement - imagine if the thread was in the middle
of an I/O operation - should the entire I/O operation be restarted
