Friends
Can anyone help Tim with this?
Tim, it'd be a good idea to say what version of Cabal you are using (cabal
--version). Also you can download a pre-compiled cabal binary I believe, which
would save you cabal-installing it. (Although it seems bad that you can get
into a situation where
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
mchakrava...@mac.com wrote:
Are you building inside a Parallels VM? If so, it is probably a Parallels
bug (which also explain why compiling GHC can lead to a kernel panic).
If the GHC build is not in a Parallels VM, I would suggest to
Any chance a cooling fan inside died and you are overheating it?
Can you reproduce the failure with other heavy load programs, can you
run a widget that monitors the internal temperatures and other sensors
during the build?
It does seem odd...
John
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Johan
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:15 AM, John Meacham j...@repetae.net wrote:
Any chance a cooling fan inside died and you are overheating it?
Can you reproduce the failure with other heavy load programs, can you
run a widget that monitors the internal temperatures and other sensors
during the
On 28/01/2011 21:08, Claus Reinke wrote:
Is there any way to have a moderate first comment by new submitter
policy for trac, to avoid the kind of ticket spam we have at the moment?
They seem to have started commenting on existing tickets now (#4510),
which could turn into a real mess really
On 28/01/2011 13:44, Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi,
My computer dies a horrible death (i.e. kernel panic) whenever I build
GHC from HEAD (currently using the quickest build configuration).
Anyone had the same problem in the past? Any workarounds?
Not that this has anything to do with your problem,
Is there any way to have a moderate first comment by new submitter
policy for trac, to avoid the kind of ticket spam we have at the moment?
They seem to have started commenting on existing tickets now (#4510),
which could turn into a real mess really quickly, if the currently known
spam accounts
On 31/01/2011 16:45, Claus Reinke wrote:
Is there any way to have a moderate first comment by new submitter
policy for trac, to avoid the kind of ticket spam we have at the moment?
They seem to have started commenting on existing tickets now (#4510),
which could turn into a real mess really
Hi
I'm trying to make the hint library work also with ghc 7 and I'm having
problems with some test-cases that are now raising exceptions. I've been able
to reduce the problem to a small example. The program below runs ghc in
interpreter-mode and attempts to parse an statement using ghc's
The following looks like a bug in (undecidable) instances resolution.
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses,FlexibleInstances,UndecidableInstances,
OverlappingInstances,IncoherentInstances #-}
class C a b
instance C a (a,b)
class D a b
instance (D a b, C b c)
Current theory:
c1jj:
_s1ep::I32 = I32[(slot_s1ep::I32 + 4)]; // CmmAssign
_s1fP::I32 = I32[(slot_s1fP::I32 + 4)]; // CmmAssign
// outOfLine should follow:
_s1eq::F64 = F64[_s1fP::I32 + 3]; // CmmAssign
I32[(youngc1jh + 4)] = c1jh; // CmmStore
foreign
relating to the ghc trac discussion ...
for some time I have had a ghc trac login, but every time I login it
asks for an email verification token
(http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/verify_email) but no token has ever
been sent to me, nor when I change my email or request a resend is one
hi list.
i have to build ghc-7.1.20110125 under mac os x, so i grabbed the stable
snapshot. Everything builds fine but the resulting compiler has problems with
ld. It passes gcc flags to ld like -march=-i686. Any ideas?
BTW while still here. Are there any specific docs available on building
The -march=-i686 issue was fixed in the past couple of days, so I'd just
grab a newer version. Not sure about the 64-bit question, though.
-Dan
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote:
hi list.
i have to build ghc-7.1.20110125 under mac os x, so i grabbed the
14 matches
Mail list logo
