[adding ghc-users]
It's not easy, Phil. Do you have any ideas?
For the 'then' case the name of the function serves as the verb. One might say
then take 4
or
then takeWhile by salary 40
For grouping one might like to say the same thing, such as
then groupBy by salary
There has been recent discussion on the Homebrew bug tracker
concerning the upcoming XCode 4.2 release by Apple, which has
apparently just gone GM (meaning they're going to make a real release
on the app store Real Soon Now.)
The primary concern is that XCode will no longer ship GCC 4.2 at all,
| In the spirit of don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good
| though, I'm solidly in favor of the original proposal as it is.
This is my thought too. George is proposing to extend Haskell's existing
mechanism for numeric literals (namely, replace 4 by (fromInteger
(4::Integer))), so
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this plan would support [(fred,45), (bill,22)] :: Map
String Int. Probably not. Maybe that's a shortcoming... but such Maps
are a rather surprising use of list literals.
What data structures other than lists do we want to construct using list
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Roman Leshchinskiy r...@cse.unsw.edu.au wrote:
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this plan would support [(fred,45), (bill,22)] :: Map
String Int. Probably not. Maybe that's a shortcoming... but such Maps
are a rather surprising use of list literals.
2011/10/5 Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com:
| In the spirit of don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good
| though, I'm solidly in favor of the original proposal as it is.
This is my thought too. George is proposing to extend Haskell's existing
mechanism for numeric literals
Hi all,
Simon PJ wrote:
should we not treat
[a,b,c]
as short for
return a `mappend` return b `mappend` return c
[...]
I'm not sure if this plan would support [(fred,45), (bill,22)] ::
Map String Int. Probably not. Maybe that's a shortcoming... but
such Maps are a
