I wrote:
Yes. The translation of record updates given in the Report
makes perfect sense for {}. It is only forbidden by
n = 1, but no reason is given for that restriction.
d wagner wrote:
It doesn't make sense to me. The translation explodes a value into a case
statement over its
| Trouble is, what type does this have?
|f x = x {}
|
| Malcolm Wallace wrote:
| f :: a - a
|
| Ian Lynagh wrote:
| That wouldn't help the original poster, as it is incompatible with
| f :: Foo Clean - Foo Dirty
There are several different things going on in this thread.
1.
On 16/11/2011 08:09, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
On 14/11/2011 14:47, Simon Marlow wrote:
(1) Does Win32 need similar additions? I can't spot any substantial
changes to it for Max's PEP383, but I'm not sure if any lower-level
library changes might have affected it.
No - Win32 file paths cannot
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:43 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hmm, but there is something you could do. Suppose a thread could be in
a mode in which instead of blocking on a BLACKHOLE it would just throw
an asynchronous exception WouldBlock. Any computation in progress would
be safely abandoned
Hi,
On 16.11.2011, at 10:43, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:43 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hmm, but there is something you could do. Suppose a thread could be in
a mode in which instead of blocking on a BLACKHOLE it would just throw
an asynchronous exception WouldBlock.
On 16/11/2011 10:20, Jean-Marie Gaillourdet wrote:
Hi,
On 16.11.2011, at 10:43, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:43 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hmm, but there is something you could do. Suppose a thread could be in
a mode in which instead of blocking on a BLACKHOLE it would
Friends,
After a very busy period of hard work with Simon, we've re-engineered GHCs
constraint
solver and I just pushed a big patch on master along with modifications in the
testsuite.
The new constraint solver is based on the existing in its core ideas but is
shorter, much
cuter, and for
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, 19:22:53, Dimitrios Vytiniotis wrote:
Friends,
After a very busy period of hard work with Simon, we've re-engineered
GHCs constraint solver and I just pushed a big patch on master along
with modifications in the testsuite.
The new constraint solver is based
On 11/15/11 8:07 PM, wagne...@seas.upenn.edu wrote:
Quoting wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org:
So far I've just defined helper functions to adjust the phantom
type[1], each of which is implemented by (\x - x { foo = foo x }).
It's a horrible hack, but at least it's hidden away in library
