Never mind. `make clean` helps. Though I have no idea why
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds
wrote:
> Hi,
> Since gold ld (GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Debian 2.22) 1.11) somehow
> better than ld, so I am using it in my debian box.
> Now I want to compile ghc 7.6.1 with i
Hey All,
I'm interested in getting involved in (/ helping out ) with dev work on GHC,
what are good ways to get started on tackling smaller bits in the near term?
(better to do simple things before more ambitious things after all!)
should i just go through the issue tracker for tasks or bugs
On 09/10/2012 15:58, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi,
I did quite a bit of work to make sure copyArray# and friends get
unrolled if the number of elements to copy is a constant. Does this
still work with the extra branch?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
> Johan Tibell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did quite a bit of work to make sure copyArray# and friends get
>> unrolled if the number of elements to copy is a constant. Does this
>> still work with the extra branch?
>
> I would expect it to but I
I'm currently having a problem with compiling modules.
I have two files Data.hs and Class.hs (Class depends on Data). When I
compile Class.hs (ghc --make Class.hs) the ghc does what it should do.
When I now make a change to Class.hs (add a newline to the end of the
file for example) and try to run
Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> Roman Leshchinskiy writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> If I'm right then I would suggest not to use copyArray# and
>> copyMutableArray# for GHC < 7.8.
>
> I've grepped today's
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/archive.tar
>
> for occurences of those two p
On 08/10/2012 12:57, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.10.2012, 12:08 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow:
On 01/10/2012 13:00, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
On 01/10/2012 12:05, Simon Marlow wrote:
This probably means that you have packages installed in your ~/.cabal
from a 32-bit GHC and yo
Roman Leshchinskiy writes:
[...]
> If I'm right then I would suggest not to use copyArray# and
> copyMutableArray# for GHC < 7.8.
I've grepped today's
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/archive.tar
for occurences of those two primitives, and this resulted in the
following ma
Johan Tibell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did quite a bit of work to make sure copyArray# and friends get
> unrolled if the number of elements to copy is a constant. Does this
> still work with the extra branch?
I would expect it to but I don't know. Does the testsuite check for this?
Roman
___
