Sorry, I left the profiling option on, which seems to suppress the
dynamic options.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds
wrote:
> Hi,
> I set "shared: True" in ~/.cabal/config, and using ghc 7.6.1. Then
> clear user space hackages and reinstall them.
> First of all, I think c
Herbert Valerio Riedel writes:
> Hello GHC HQ,
>
> I've been trying to improve/fix a minor optimization sub-optimality
> w.r.t to the following code (code like that results from the
> generics-based NFData deriver[1]):
[...]
jfyi, this has been migrated to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/tic
Hi Apostolos,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:07:56AM -0400, asyropou...@aol.com wrote:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.4.1/html/building/sec-porting-ghc.html#sec-booting-from-hc
Some community members have made Solaris binary distributions in the
past. It would be easier to start from one of
Hi Kazu,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:37:32PM +0900, Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
>
> I seems to us (my friends and me) that term rewriting rules for
> ByteString are not fired in recent GHCs.
Thanks for the report. I've filed a ticket here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7374
Thanks
Ian
Thanks. Certainly a bug. I've created a ticket
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7372.
Turns out that it's fixed in HEAD already, and I *think* the fix is in
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7312, which should get into 7.6.2.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: gla
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:46:28PM +0100, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
> You can avoid the error by replacing
>
> eval :: Exp -> (->) Memory Integer
>
> with
>
> eval :: Exp -> Memory -> Integer
>
> which should be the same, but apparently isn't internally in GHC. This is
> definitely a bug.
As
You can avoid the error by replacing
eval :: Exp -> (->) Memory Integer
with
eval :: Exp -> Memory -> Integer
which should be the same, but apparently isn't internally in GHC. This is
definitely a bug.
Sjoerd
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:55 AM, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Toda
